Previous | Table of Contents | Next |
In the second design, the mean is confounded with the third-order interaction, and the main effects (A, B, C, and D) are confounded with the second-order interactions. It is generally assumed that the higher order interactions are smaller than the lower order interactions. If this assumption is true, then the first design will give better estimates of main effects than the second design.
The fractional factorial design of Table 19.4 can be called the I = ABCD design and that shown in Table 19.5 is the I = ABC design. This is because given just one confounding, it is possible to list all other confoundings by multiplying the two sides of the confounding by different terms and using two simple rules:
Let us illustrate this with the first design, which has
I = ABCD
Multiplying both sides by A, we get
A = A2BCD = BCD
Multiplying both sides by B, C, D, and AB, we get
B = AB2CD = ACD
C = ABC2D = ABD
D = ABCD2 = ABC
AB = A2B2CD = CD
and so on.
The polynomial I = ABCD used to generate all confoundings for this design is called the generator polynomial for this design. Similarly, the generator polynomial for the second design is I = ABC.
In a 2k1 design, 21 effects are confounded together. In a 2kp design, 2p effects are confounded together. The generator polynomial has 2p terms. For example, the 274 design presented earlier in Table 19.1 was obtained from a 23 design by replacing columns AB, AC, BC, and ABC by D, E, F, and G, respectively. Thus, this design has the following confoundings:
D = AB, E = AC, F = BC, G = ABC
Multiplying each of the four equations by their left-hand sides, we get
I = ABD, I = ACE, I = BCF, I = ABCG
Or equivalently,
I = ABD = ACE = BCF = ABCG
The product of any subset of the preceding terms is also equal to I. Thus the complete generator polynomial is
I = ABD = ACE = BCF = ABCG = BCDE = ACDF
= CDG = ABEF = BEG = AFG = DEF = ADEG
= BDFG = ABDG = CEFG = ABCDEFG
Other confoundings for the design can be obtained by multiplying this equation by A,B,.... For example,
A = BD = CE = ABCF = BCG = ABCDE = CDF
= ACDG = BEF = ABEG = FG = ADEF = DEG
= ABDFG = BDG = ACEFG = BCDEFG
The resolution of a design is measured by the order of effects that are confounded. The order of an effect is the number of factors included in it. For example, ABCD is of order 4, while I is of order 0. If an ith-order effect is confounded with a jth-order term, the confounding is said to be of order i + j. The minimum of orders of all confoundings of a design is called its resolution. In other words, a design is said to be of resolution r if no j factor effect is confounded with any effects containing fewer than r j factors.
By tradition, the resolution is denoted by the capital Roman letters. For example, a 251 design with resolution of 3 is denoted as RIII design, resolution III design, or 251III design. In such a design, the mean response I is confounded with third- or higher-order effects. The main effects are confounded with second- or higher-order effects.
To determine the resolution of a 2kp design, we only need to find the minimum of orders of the effects confounded with the mean response.
A = BCD, B = ACD, C = ABD, AB = CD
AC = BD, BC = AD, ABC = D, I = ABCD
Notice that the first-order effects (j = 1) are confounded with the third-order effects. Second-order effects (j = 2) are confounded only with second-order effects. The mean response I (j = 0) is confounded with fourth-order effects. In each case, the sum of the order of confounded effects is greater than or equal to 4. Thus, this is a RIV design.
We could have determined the order simply by looking at the generator polynomial I = ABCD. There is only one effect, namely, ABCD, that is confounded with the mean response. Its order is 4, and so the design resolution is IV.
Example 19.6 Consider the 241 design of Table 19.5. The generator polynomial is I = ABD. The order of ABD is 3, and so this is an RIII, design.
Example 19.7 In Section 19.3, the 274 design of Table 19.1 was shown to have the following confoundings:
I = ABD = ACE = BCF = ABCG = BCDE = ACDF
= CDG = ABEF = BEG = AFG = DEF = ADEG
= BDFG = ABDG = CEFG = ABCDEFG
This is a resolution III design.
A design of higher resolution is considered a better design. This is because of the assumption that higher order interactions are smaller than lower order effects. This need not always be true. If this is true, then it is better to have higher order interactions confounded with main effects. For example, given a choice between the two designs I = ABCD (an RIV design) and I = ABD (an RIII design) without any prior information about the relative magnitude of the interactions, it is preferable to use the RIV design. On the other hand, if it is known that the ABD interaction is negligible, the I = ABD design may be preferred even though it has a lower resolution.
Previous | Table of Contents | Next |